Loading ...
After the school faced crucial cuts with the failure of last year’s referendum, a second referendum has been a top concern for many members of the school community.
That concern won’t be addressed this year.
In an exclusive interview with Clarion, School Board President Matt Sinde said, “We will not have a referendum this year.”
According to Sinde, in order to have a successful referendum, the taxpayers need to have enough time in advance to know about it. Approximately 6 to 8 months is ideal to accomplish this goal.
How will the school cope without even the possibility of additional referendum revenue? Sinde said that, with no referendum for next year, the school needs to have balance between fiscal responsibility and education for the students. One step the board is going to take is to start the budget process earlier. Seeking community input is a major factor in this process. The board would like to know what the community thinks and feels.
Sinde suggested community members keep a lookout for additional notices and meetings about the budgeting process that will be coming out shortly.
Sinde said, ” We need to remember that our funds will be limited and we must be able to spend those funds effectively to accomplish our goal of providing the best education to our students.”
Although people voted against last year’s referendum by a wide margin, Sinde did not view this as a negative reaction to the school in general.
“In talking with people in the community, I do not feel that they are against RB. On the contrary, they feel that their children get a great education at our school. I have not had one person say that RB is a bad school,” Sinde said.
Still, the referendum vote sent a clear signal that something had to change.
Sinde said, “The vote on the referendum was the community asking the school to live within their budget.”
In Sinde’s opinion, while the community wants a great education for their students, with the economic downturn, they also want to be able to afford it. He believes that the economy was an important factor in the vote of the referendum. People were uncertain if houses would be foreclosed, jobs would be kept, and retirements would fall through.
Given the importance of the issue of school financing, Sinde knows what is at stake.
“We are committed to our stakeholders to be transparent as possible through this budget development process,” he said.
dmancoff • Oct 14, 2011 at 7:40 am
SPONSOR’S NOTE:
In response to Louis Robling’s question about the Clarion and “trolls,” I wanted to post our commenting policy.
In brief, Clarion seeks to accept every comment from its reading community without restriction. However, on the topic of “trolling,” Clarion does make these restrictions to commenting:
-Comments that are irrelevant/completely off the topic of the story within which they originate will not be published.
-Comments that make factual allegations which cannot be proven and/or are not part of common knowledge will not be published.
-Comments whose sole puropse is to personally attack or degrade without making a factual argument will not be published.
-Comments which contain “hate speech” will not be published.
-D. Mancoff (Clarion sponsor)
Louis Robling • Oct 13, 2011 at 10:25 pm
First off I want to say congratulations to Clarion for getting what might be the story of the year. Very impressive. I guess the next question is, will you allow this to turn in to the next spot for trolls?
As for the referendum, this is great news. RB has finally realized that throwing money at the problem does not fix things and blind siding tax payers is not the way to go about running that school. Now the board as well as the administrators will be forced to find new ways to reduce spending without necessarily cutting the rest of the programs. RB has to reinvent its self (which I personally pointed out last year at a student only forum). Great news.
Also in response to deborah maxwell, things changed. They are no longer going forward with the plan that was previously laid out by the board. The potential cuts will need to be changed because there is no potential for new money this year. Had they left the cuts up, it would have been misleading to people.
Deborah Maxwell • Oct 13, 2011 at 2:23 pm
Mr. Sinde, if your statement of, “We are committed to our stakeholders to be transparent as possible through this budget development process,” is true, then why has the list of current and potential budget cuts for next year disappeared from the school website and/or the Board of Education page?
Pam Powers • Oct 13, 2011 at 12:55 pm
The problem is, that unfortunately, we don’t have a balanced budget. We are currently operating with a deficit and even more programs and activities will have to be cut. I’m not certain how you can continue to provide a quality education and experience with inadequate revenues. It is also unfortunate that this issue was not addressed sooner.